FACEBOOK HAS BECOME A MENACE TO PUBLIC HEALTH THAT ROUTINELY ENGAGES IN BUSINESS, ADVERTISING AND SECURITIES FRAUD. FACEBOOK HAS BECOME AN ANTISOCIAL PLATFORM THAT USES CENSORSHIP AND DISINFORMATION PROMOTING A CANCEL CULTURE, FASCISM AND EVEN VIOLENCE AMONGST ITS USERS IN ORDER TO OBSCURE CERTIAN OPINIONS AS PART OF A SOCIAL ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT WITH A DANGEROUS AGENDA.
We are joining with people to sue Facebook for the mental, physical and tangible damage that their mismanagement and fraudulent and misguided business practices have done and continue to do to individuals, groups, society and government. You do not need to be a Facebook user to support us or join us in our lawsuits if you, a loved one or friend or your business has suffered damage as a result of people being programed by Facebook.
Although there are several other harmful, so called, Social Media platforms and businesses, our initial lawsuit will be against Facebook. We will prove the damages in our complaint based the experiences of the creator of this project along with all of the people and businesses who join us in this lawsuit. In addition, we will win this lawsuit on the basis of presentations made by professional scientists, doctors and insiders in the social media business world and based on information that is already freely available in the public venue for years. The case will be presented and prosecuted against Facebook by the initial litigant in this case with the assistance of the Social Media Lawsuit (SML) organization and professional lawyers from reputable firms that will represent everyone who joins into this lawsuit.
Originally Facebook was a useful and fun utility to find old friends and to share life and opinions with other people. However, over the years, for whatever reason the management of Facebook has decided to use the Facebook platform to engage in a destructive psychological war with over 40% of it’s own users in order to manipulate the thinking and behavior of people around the world to achieve outcomes desired by management of Facebook. “Facebook’s War” against it’s own users and other people around the world serves no constructive purpose, it has no constructive outcomes to date and it must end.
Among other things this lawsuit (Civil Indictment) will prove the following allegations (counts) and seek the following results (relief) from Facebook:
. MONETARY COMPENSATION FOR THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN HARMED by Facebook’s Fraudulent and Deceptive business practices, false advertising and false and misleading public securities filings that fail to disclose a variety of major problems with Facebook that investors into Facebook have a right to know.
Complaint: For several years Facebook has been openly committing business and advertising fraud as well as breaking many U.S. criminal and civil laws, including election interference, lying to the U.S. Congress while under oath and other laws. Facebook has openly argued as recently as 2020 to the U.S. Congress that it is entitled to protections from lawsuits based on the fact that they are not a publishing company while at the same time they obtain content for free from users and then edit or censor that content acting as a publisher in plain sight for everyone to see. Contrary to sworn testimony by management of Facebook, lawyers for Facebook openly argue in other court cases that Facebook is a publisher deserving of the protections associated with being a publisher whenever it suits Facebook (see the Redwood City lawsuit). The list of fraudulent misrepresentations, false advertising and damage done to users of the system as well as marketers who pay to advertise on Facebook are so numerous we will reserve a more thorough list of offences in the formal legal complaint. Facebook claims it stopped selling it’s information to third parties, such as Cambridge Analytica because of the unethical use of their platform meanwhile Facebook and their censorship is unethically using it’s platform as a psychological warfare weapon themselves in much worse and harmful ways that any other third parties that are known to the general public to be associated with Facebook at this time.
What Facebook must do: Facebook must pay cash compensation to it’s entire user base and those effected by it’s advertising and business fraud as well as it’s other misguided manipulation of the people of the world. Exact damages and amounts that will be sought as compensation for “Facebook Fraud” will be provided in the complaint by us at the filing of the case.
. MONETARY COMPENSATION FOR THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN HARMED by use of Facebook users of Facebook due to the negligence of the management of Facebook.
Complaint: Over the years Facebook developed Software Algorithms in order to engineer (publish) content that is delivered to users in order to maximize profit. As time has gone on and these Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence (AAI) are becoming so effective that management of Facebook has been using their platform in order to engineer and control social behavior, election outcomes, political results, trends, thoughts and ideas in the USA and overseas. In many cases Facebook works in cooperation with and helps enemies of the United States to control people in their respective countries using Facebook. These Facebook programs are being abused and management of Facebook has been warned repeatedly that that there are ethical concerns over the negative side effects of their own systems on the mental, physical and spiritual health of Facebook users and everyone else in society with whom Facebook users interact. Some negative results of Facebook’s social engineering programs that rely on censorship have lead to dangerous paranoia, physical illness, misguided “resistance” against government and fellow citizens, riots, criminal behavior, and a host of other antisocial and destructive behavior. A great deal of the destructive behavior including suicide and vandalism since 2012 can be directly attributed to people who were radicalized or otherwise driven to commit acts of violence while under the influence of Facebook AAI.
Facebook has knowingly allowed it’s platform to be used as a tool to organize violent protests, riots, vandalism and other acts of destructive lawlessness. Along with those people who commit crimes, Facebook is also directly responsible for the commission of these crimes because it knowingly acts in concert and in support of the offenders.
What Facebook must do: Facebook must disclose it’s current and previous social engineering projects, stop these projects and pay for damage done to individuals, businesses and governments for the abuse of the technology of manipulation. SML will show that Facebook’s AAI has resulted in radicalization and inspired people to riot, loot and kill other people. Facebook must pay for the damage to individuals, businesses and government that can be traced back to use of Facebook by the perpetrators of the crimes.
. A TEMPORARY HOLD ON ALL ALGORITHMS THAT CONTROL POSTS VIEWABLE BY USERS UNTIL PEOPLE CAN OPT OUT OF ALGORITHM CONTROLLED HOME FEEDS.
Complaint: We contend that Facebooks Algorithms that are responsible for controlling what people are seeing in their data feeds are damaging many people by increasing anxiety, paranoia, hostility, antisocial behavior and in increasing numbers cases of dangerous radicalization. Facebooks platform uses Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence (AAI) in order to maximize it’s profitability by delivering targeted information to people based on what AAI believes people want to see. However, the side effects of the AAI are resulting in the hostile radicalization and cult like programing of otherwise peaceful people whose concerns about newsworthy issues are being amplified by AAI in such a way as to make people believe that things are far worse than they are in reality. Many ordinary people, and other more vulnerable people are being driven into paranoia, resulting in extreme hatred, acts of violence, riots and even insurrection. Individuals and businesses have been threatened and physically harmed by acts of violence and in some cases people have been killed and businesses have been looted and burned to the ground. In some cases, AAI is being driven by Facebook business clients including government intelligence agencies who are actually interested in leveraging the Facebook platform and AAI to attempt to program the hearts and minds of people in an abusive way in to achieve social behavior that favors their own agenda. While management of Facebook claims to be censoring information based on truthfulness they actually promote unproven and unverifiable targeted content that they promote as factual under the pretense of “science” and “experts” in order to do everything from re-writing history as we know it or to promote alternative lifestyles, ideas and social and government constructs that have been proven to be harmful to people through history.
What Facebook must do: Facebook should allow the option for users to switch their feeds between those selected by Facebook’s Algorithms OR Last In First Out (LIFO) post feeds as was originally used at the launch of Facebook. Facebook needs to study and disclose the risks and side effects including, depression and radicalization that may occur by use of Facebook Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence (AAI). Moreover, Facebook disclose to users the underlying results that are being targeted by Facebook’s Algorithms and AI. In addition, Facebook must study the side effects and effectiveness of it’s algorithms and the positive and negative effects on the health of people who choose so allow Facebook to alter their home feeds. Facebook must disclose to the public the government agencies that are responsible for any advertisements or influence over the AAI feeds that are being generated and the goal of the influence.
. STOP FALSE ADVERTISING AS A NEWS PLATFORM INSTEAD OF A SOCIAL OPINION PLATFORM:
Complaint: At it’s best Facebook can enable relationships and add good utilities that can enhance people’s experience of life yet at the same time Facebook is essentially a modern day bathroom wall where people can write messages for all to see and as such it should not be treated as anything other than sharing of opinions. Facebook is not a news agency or a news broadcaster and it has no responsibility to ascertain the truth or accuracy of any post or censor posts based on anything other than violating already existing laws, such as threats, defamation, posting of crimes, inciting riots or acts of terrorism. If Facebook was a news agency it would be subject to rules and laws governing false and misleading articles and defamation of character, but it was never designed to be a news agency. Over the years management of Facebook has created a new liability for itself by unnecessarily assuming the role of the editor in chief of a new publishing house complete with editors who edit and censor posts based on whatever the management of Facebook deems to be in the public interest or in their in their own personal political, religious and business interests. Facebook is holding itself out as an organization that is able to measure the truthfulness of users OPINIONS as well news articles and other information posted by Facebook users.
Facebook must stop holding itself out as a platform where people can go to access news and truth as posted by other users and edited by Facebook management. The very notion that Facebook knows more than the doctors, scientists, professionals or lay people whose articles are posted into Facebook is ridiculous. But this is the role that Facebook is projecting.
Facebook holding itself out as an accurate truth and relevancy detector is false, misleading and fraudulent. Facebook has placed itself into an impossible position by anyone’s standards. In fact, mistakes by Facebook that have resulted in the suppression of medical treatments and divergence from reasonable behaviors that have actually resulted in countless, unnecessary deaths of people for which Facebook is directly responsible. Facebook has made itself responsible because of the position into which they’ve put themselves by their false and misleading public statements that have lead people to trust Facebook while Facebook engages in censorship of opinions that would have helped people live if Facebook had not engaged in censorship in the cases where Facebook censored the wrong opinions or announcements.
Facebook’s own behavior and censorship makes it culpable to the cover up and facilitation of crimes committed by politicians and other public figures.
What Facebook must do: If Facebook would like to become a news business it will have to formally enter into the “news” business and subject itself to the laws, regulations and liabilities of every other ordinary news agency. In the meantime, Facebook’s arbitrary and capricious shadow banning, banning, slowing of circulation, censorship and “fact checking” practices are not achieving the goals as claimed by Facebook and instead are causing great anxiety to Facebook users. In some cases Facebooks censorship is squelching legitimate public service messages and opinions that could help people and as such Facebook’s censorship is actually causing mental and physical harm to many people and society at large. Facebook must be held accountable for the damage that they’ve already done and stop misleading people by holding itself out as anything other than a opinion platform with articles and opinions that are unverifiable by Facebook.
. STOP UNECESSARY & UNHEALTHY CENSORSHIP:
Complaint: It is completely unnecessary for Facebook to attempt to control ANY content OTHER THAN content that constitutes a violation of State or Federal Law, such as, posting of crimes, use of Facebook to organize crimes or riots, or posts containing threats or sexual content, etc.. Facebook’s misguided attempts to control content beyond reasonable violations of State and Federal Law are resulting in unnecessary and damaging levels of anxiety in people whose posts are being censored and shadow banned. Science, medicine and psychology have acknowledged that in order to promote health people need to be able to at least feel that they are allowed to express themselves and people need to be able to cope with dissenting opinions of other people in constructive and prosocial ways. Hampering of self expression by any means is known to lead to anger, then sorrow then depression and resignation. Depression and resignation often causes physical disease in people. In the case of Facebooks censorship additional anxiety manifests in people becoming suspicious and rightfully paranoid of authorities who are beyond their control and who are attempting to manipulate their speech, thinking and behavior. The culture and basis of the laws of the United States are to allow for people to express themselves and engage in debate and to opt out of debate in kind and Facebook is going against these norms.
Furthermore it is virtually impossible for Facebook to make determinations of Fact and Truth about expressions of opinion and about real issues that are still under dispute by investigators and by the scientific or law enforcement community. For example, Facebooks ban on articles promoting hydroxychloroquine has undoubtedly opened up Facebook to be responsible for the death of thousands of people after the fact pending the resolution of the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine that has, as yet, not been resolved by the scientific community. As a result the “great good” that Facebook falsely claims that it seeks to do, in many cases, is doing great harm and actually preventing people from getting medical care and awareness that may save their lives.
Similarly, Facebooks arbitrary and capricious decisions to reduce the distribution of articles such as in the case regarding Hunter Biden’s selling influence of his father Joe Biden places Facebook directly in the position of interfering with the elections of the United States since Facebook could not possibly have vetted the article sufficiently when Facebook made the decision to squelch the article. Facebook claimed that it’s “Fact Checkers” would come back to make a determination about the factual basis of the Hunter Biden’s story, but weeks after the story’s distribution was limited by Facebook the, so called, Fact Checkers have yet to make their determination. In this example, it can not be any more obvious that Facebook is attempting to influence and interfere with the U.S. Elections in order to favor and protect Joe Biden from any negative story’s whether the stories are true or false.
Facebook is unnecessarily holding itself out to be a “protector” and “arbiter of truth.” By holding itself out as being able to do the impossible task of Fact Finding without any investigative resources necessary to find facts, Facebook MUST BE HELD LIABLE for damages for EACH AND EVERY INSTANCE that their censorship failed to “catch” problem posts. In many cases Facebook can be proven to be on the wrong side of health issues and political stories that has lead to death and in the cases of politics Facebooks malfeasance continues to result in ideological anarchy which is translating into physical violence.
Again, Facebook’s own behavior and censorship makes it culpable to the cover up and facilitation of crimes committed by politicians and other public figures and therefor Facebook must be held accountable for it’s participation and facilitation of crimes and criminal behavior.
What Facebook must to: Facebook must stop engaging in the business of censorship of anything other than posts that cause violations of already existing Federal, State and Local laws. Facebook must be made to pay for damage that they are doing to our elections and to individuals and groups who experienced anxiety and even lost access to potentially life saving information because of Facebook censorship.
. CHANGE FACT CHECKING TO “FACEBOOK OPINION”:
Complaint: In too many cases the so called “Fact Checking” features of Facebook and Facebook selected “Fact Checkers” are actually “Opinions” in disguise and are knowingly and intentionally misleading. Undoubtedly Facebook would argue this is harmless error, however, their failed and imperfect practice amounts to false advertising practices and causes people to be mislead, psychologically manipulated without their permission and experience anxiety. Whenever someone sees an article with a Facebook “Fact Check” on it, a person might skip over the article all together because they do not know that the, so called, “Fact Check” is actually an “Opinion Check” with a simple recount of the actual facts. No-where has this caused more damage than in the U.S. elections in which Facebook has literally tampered with the elections by mislabeling news making articles appear to be false in order to favor Joe Biden when the underlying “Fact Check” supports the associated post.
In too many cases Facebook’s “Fact Checkers” are simply political and ideological partisans and are not performing any fact checks at all but are attempting to manipulate peoples minds, opinions and behaviors without their permission. Neither is it possible for any Facebook user to engage in any type of discussion, rating or review of the authors of these fake “Fact Checks.”
The ongoing abuse and false advertising used by Facebook in association with it’s spreading propaganda and engaging in psychological warfare through it’s bogus “Fact Checking” mechanisms is inducing extraordinary levels of anxiety and mistrust of authority within Facebook users and society and is so extreme that a rational and reasonable person can argue that it is Treasonous and an attempt to create Insurrection in addition to illegal tampering with an election.
What Facebook must do: Facebook can no longer engage in damaging psychological warfare and manipulation of it’s users without it’s users being warned about the possibility of people being intentionally or unintentionally manipulated in an unwanted way by the abuse of Facebooks platform. It is not possible for Facebook or any person, organization or government to be omniscient and have sufficient investigative powers and authorities to ascertain the “Truth” in every case. Certainly Facebook does not have the same investigative authority to access information that law enforcement and intelligence agencies can access. For these reasons and many other Facebook has to stop referring to it’s investigations as “Factual”, “Fact Checking” or “Truth” because the use of these words are proven to be false and misleading and use of this language promotes Facebook to a god-like level which is exposing Facebook and the entire population of the world effected by Facebook users to unsustainable liability.
. A SIMPLE SOLUTION, OPINIONS INSTEAD OF FACT CHECKING AND CENSORSHIP:
Complaint: Facebook should stop it’s misguided efforts to do what is not possible for any group of human beings to do and establish itself as the source of facts and truth. There is an easy solution that releases Facebook and everyone else from the hazards and liabilities of having to be the final arbiter of “facts” and “truth.” The solution is use of good old fashion and responsible disclaimers and proper use of simple Facebook comments using the proper language to describe opinions of Facebook.
What Facebook must do: In stead of Facebook attempting to place itself or ANYONE ELSE as an authority of what posts are facts or opinions, Facebook needs to simply place a small banner below EVERY SINGLE POST that reminds people that Facebook is for “social discourse” and no post should be interpreted as “news” or “factual” no matter even if it comes from a “news” outlet, government authority or anywhere else. Facebook needs to place a small banner at the bottom or top of every post made by every person on Facebook that says, “Warning: Facebook can not verify the authenticity of the source, facts, truthfulness or newsworthiness of any post.”
Instead of obscuring entire posts with misleading labels like “Fact Checked” Facebook needs to “come clean” with it’s users and simply place Facebook “Fact Checks” as the first comment in the list of comments under a post and the comment should be labeled as exactly what it is “Facebook’s Opinion,” regardless of who is allowed to write the opinion or “fact check” by Facebook. The minute that Facebook appoints or otherwise allows someone to be a “Fact Checker” contributor, whatever it is that that “Fact Checker” posts becomes the responsibility and therefore the “opinion” of Facebook and it must be labeled as such. The idea that Facebook somehow know the efficacy of medication, the effectiveness of masks in preventing the spread of a new virus or the veracity of reports of emails of Hunter Biden’s found is simply not credible and therefore can only be interpreted as acts of bad faith or attempts to spread partisan propaganda.
. CRACK DONW ON FRAUDULENT BUSINESSES AND FAKE ADVERTISEMENTS:
Complaint: Every day Facebook routinely allows fraudulent businesses to advertise on the Facebook platform which results in people being defrauded of millions of dollars. Facebook does not have an adequate method to report and remove false and fraudulent advertisements before thousands of people have already lost money. Facebook routinely allows the advertisement of fake magazines with phony quotes using the image of real celebrities who are also routinely victims of Facebooks fraudulent advertising schemes.
What Facebook must do: Facebook needs to create a better more effective system to report fraudulent advertisements and Facebook needs to invest resources into bringing to justice internet scammers that use their platform for false advertising. Facebook needs to find ways to reimburse or offer some level of buyer protection that sellers can acquire that can help Facebook to keep users from being damaged. In many cases, Facebook must pay damages for losses already suffered by people who have been burned by scammers on Facebook.
. WARNINGS ABOUT THE HAZARDS OF USING FACEBOOK TO MENTAL AND PHYSICAL HEALTH AND FINANCE.
Complaint: Many of the hazards to mental and physical health caused to users of Facebook are acknowledged by management of Facebook and yet there is no health hazard warnings being adequately provided to users of Facebook. In addition, Facebook’s use of AAI subjects people to mental manipulation and health hazards without their permission.
What Facebook must do: Face book must ensure that upon opening of their app or online login accounts that users are provided with simple and clear warnings at least twice per month about the health hazards that do arise as a result of using Facebook. These simple warnings should offer links to more details about health hazards, ways to reduce or avoid the hazards and support groups that can help curb addiction to Facebook and the negative health effects associated with using Facebook. There should also be links warning how to identify false advertisements that make their way into Facebook’s data streams. Facebook needs to get involved and create consumer protection groups to go after online scammers. People must be provided with the option to opt out of Facebook’s use of AAI threads on the posts and even the way that advertisements presented to them so that advertisements are clearly marked as “Advertisements” so as not to be confused with users opinion posts or legitimate news or government agencies. Facebook must warn people that they may be exposed to propaganda that attempts to manipulate their thoughts and behaviors.
. ADD FEATURES TO DEVELOPE AND ENCOURAGE MORE RESPONSIBLE AND HEALTHY USE OF FACEBOOK:
Complaint: The potential hazards to using Facebook are well known and documented. SOME of these potential hazards include addiction to Facebook, anxiety, paranoia, depression, receiving negative comments, being bullied, exposure to propaganda, radicalization, loss of appetite, feeding attention deficit disorder, declines in physical activity that lead to problems with physical health and disease, isolation from friends and family, disruption of friendship and family relationships, antisocial behavior, exposure to “cancel culture,” “group think” and “public shaming,” exposure to stalkers, human trafficker’s and other criminals who attempt to exploit Facebook users. The list of potential hazards go on and on however Facebook does not to an adequate job at warning users or helping educate and provide features to Facebook that can help prevent users from all of the hazards of using Facebook.
What Facebook needs to do: Facebook needs to build features into their own system that helps users to monitor and even automatically limit or schedule their engagement with Facebook. Facebook must actively study on an ongoing basis and educate users about the effects of using Facebook too much and even help make suggestions to users about how to detect, prevent and stop overuse of Facebook. Facebook needs to create and produce videos that warn people of the general hazards of using Facebook and make suggestions about how people can help prevent harm to themselves as a result of their interactions with Facebook. At least once per month Facebook should force users to take a brief “user health quiz” to find out if the user is engaging with Facebook in any negative ways and to make suggestions to the user after the quiz of what tools and methods are available to help them curb potential over or abusive use of Facebook.
. TRANSPARENCY ABOUT ALGORITHMS AND POTENTIAL HAZARDS:
Complaint: Facebooks use of Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence (AAI) is specifically designed to target Facebook users in order to leverage or even create the behaviors of Facebook users in order to achieve outcomes that are favorable to the monetary and ideological interests of the management of Facebook. Facebook users are being manipulated by AAI without ever having given permission and without knowing how the AAI is designed to influence their thoughts and behaviors. Facebook uses and experiments with new kinds of AAI in order to more effectively manipulate users behaviors every day without Facebook users having any awareness of what the underlying ideological goals of the management of Facebook and their respective AAI is being used to achieve. In this way Facebooks current way of using of AAI represents a gross violation of ethics and raises to the level of using a behavioral control weapon against people who are completely unaware. This very type of behavioral modification technique is already classified as a psychological weapon that is forbidden to be used by anyone other than the military in several countries in the EU.
What Facebook needs to do: Facebook needs to make disclosures in it’s Securities public filings and to it’s users as to exactly what outcomes are being targeted by Facebook’s use of AAI, and what is being done to measure any negative side effects that are resulting by Facebook’s use of AAI. Facebook users must be allowed to opt-out of receiving information driven by AAI as apposed to simply seeing the last thing posted in their thread. Is Facebook using this technology in concert with any government authorities that would somehow authorize or justify it’s use of it’s AAI psychological weapons? Is Facebook using it’s AAI capabilities in jurisdictions where it is prohibited from use because it is considered a weapon? What is the complete list of agenda’s that management of Facebook is attempting to promote using it’s AAI and what outcomes are being targeted? These are only some of the questions that Facebook users are entitled to know and that Facebook needs to disclose whenever they add, delete or change their campaigns that leverage Facebook AAI.
. STUDIES & PREVENTION:
Complaint: Facebook does not perform adequate studies and public disclosures about the negative side effects of the use of the Facebook platform and the AAI. Facebook has failed to disclose in it’s public Securities filings, the dangers, negative side effects, and social engineering agenda in which Facebook engages every day. This failure to disclose known problems that effect users of Facebook, including Facebook’s failure to disclose it’s own specific attempts to use it’s platform in order to achieve political, business and social goals represents tangible risks for every user and investor in Facebook that is currently being hidden from public filings. Human beings are not lab animals that can be unknowingly subjected to psychological manipulation and experimentation and no Facebook users have ever agreed to allow themselves to be subjected to psychological operations, experimentation and manipulation.
What Facebook needs to do: Facebook must agree to pay a certain percentage of it’s earnings to independent and even adversarial organizations and auditors and scientists to help identify and help curb any negative side effects that result from the Facebook platform.
With respect to damage already done, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) must launch an investigation into the management practices of Facebook in order to determine exactly what hazards to Facebook users and negative side effects to society and users were known to management and were failed to be disclosed to users and investors in public filings. The (SEC) must launch and investigation to determine what behaviors and outcomes management of Facebook has been trying to achieve by using the Facebook platform without any disclosure to Facebook users, investors or society. Facebook must be made to pay damages to the SEC that should be distributed to Facebook users and investors because of Facebook’s failure to disclose it’s internal attempts to manipulate the general public to achieve specific outcomes without the knowledge of their users. Undoubtedly, depression, anxiety, riots and other negative behaviors have resulted from Facebook management’s personal and undisclosed attempts at behavioral modification. Facebook needs to pay for this unethical abuse of it’s systems to impose it’s own secret agenda on it’s users, investors and the world at large. If necessary the SEC should make referrals from their investigation to the Department of Justice to hold Facebook management responsible for their actions in their individual capacities. Just because Mark Zuckerberg and management of Facebook are the some of the richest people in the world, it does not mean that they are righteous people and it does not mean that they have not knowingly abused their power to manipulate people and their wealth should not insulate them from serving time in prison if they are guilty of failures to disclose psychological operations, health risks and criminal negligence through abuse of the powerful systems under their control.
. INVASION OF PRIVACY AND SPYING:
Complaint: We believe that it’s possible that Facebook uses the microphone and camera on peoples phones and computers to monitor peoples private conversations and activity. We intend to find out to what extent any this is happening and with whom and with what government agencies may be receiving this information and what they are doing with it. While Facebook’s linkages to U.S. Intelligence and U.S. Law Enforcement might be protected from being publicly disclosed, these interactions can not be completely shielded from our lawsuit and U.S. Federal Judges are under no obligation by law to shield the U.S. Government or it’s agencies from damage being done by the abuse of any systems regardless of their National Security classification and regardless. In addition any agreements made between the U.S. Government and Facebook (directly or indirectly) to protect Facebook from criminal prosecution for abuse of Facebook systems by the U.S. Government are not applicable to lawsuits against Facebook by private citizens and businesses that are entitled to damages in civil actions.
What Facebook needs to do: Facebook needs to disclose the extent to which it monitors people and where that information goes and what it’s used for. Facebook must provide an option to turn off such functionality. Facebook may need to pay damages to those people who were negatively damaged by Facebook as a result of Facebook’s use or misuse by U.S. Government authorities.
. MONETARY DAMAGES and FUND:
Complaint: There are damages caused by Facebook that have yet to be identified.
What Facebook needs to do: Facebook should agree to pay a percentage of their gross income into a monetary fund that can be accessed by current and future litigants who prove that they were damaged either directly or indirectly by Facebook.